How well do we know about abortion?
This is an arguable fact and topic to be addressing special in today’s modern era. On one side a group of women thinks that abortion would be a freedom to live the life they want and they can have a peaceful life yet another group of people thinks continuing abortion intentionally is an act of external people owning our bodies and that is a form of destruction.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says abortion bans are a “brutal form of oppression” and are about “owning women”(American politician and activist)
The above-mentioned claim implies that restricting access to abortion is a type of abuse that calls for the control of women’s bodies and sexuality. How much do women need to be free in their own lives? She adds that restricting access to birth control and providing thorough sex education are two more ways that religious extremists use to try and regulate women’s sexuality. Incorporating an essential point that birth control pills regulate childbirth to 90% or to a greater extent, religious practice therefore tends to control unwanted or wanted women’s sexuality to reduce the likelihood of childbirth. This emphasizes the Patriarchal Society’s ideology, which views males as the dominant component and how they prioritize certain things in society while women do not.
Women’s access is constrained, whereas men are free to access anything, wherever. A basic goal of women’s liberalism is to eliminate gender inequality. Ocasio Cortez specifically states that abortion restrictions are patriarchal tactics intended to oppress women and regulate their bodies and sexuality.
In general, we are fully aware of the fact that the patriarchal culture prioritizes males over women and views women’s nature as a hindrance to society while viewing men as a blessing. They make the assumption that men are the ones who work, bring home the pay, and manage the household in order to better understand this. Whatever the case, the fact remains that a man is nothing without a woman. In addition to the many pressures placed on her by society, a woman is one of the key family members to run her own household.
Bringing attention to the fact that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortex’s speech is controversial might lead to criticism from a variety of people and organizations. However, those who disagree may view this as an oversimplification or mischaracterization of the subject. The party who agrees with her may view her statement as an accurate portrayal of the causes and effects of abortion laws.
Depending on how one critical and discriminating audience pursues from their points of view, one of the two hands can be acceptable and the other unacceptable. When they come to an agreement, they take into account things like their attitudes and ideals on abortion, women’s rights, and patriarchy.
In essence, women who believe that a woman’s right to choose regarding abortion restrictions recognize that they will restrict a woman’s ability to make decisions about her own body and future. They came to argue about the greatest burdens placed on women and the violation of their human rights, and they can focus on specific situations where pregnancy tends to endanger a woman’s health or cause her to become pregnant. The minority saw this as essential and forceful disapproval of initiatives to limit women’s rights and access to reproductive health care, which can ruin and shorten a woman’s life. This element might challenge one’s values and beliefs.
In conclusion, those who oppose abortion might see such restrictions as necessary for defending the rights of the mother and the unborn child. However, they might also try to argue that abortion is a form of violence against an unborn child and that restricting it is meant to protect the unborn child’s rights and interests. Ultimately, the characterization of abortion restrictions as a brochure form of operation depends on each person’s rights and freedoms.
The “Human Life Protection Act” bans abortions in the state except when “abortion is necessary in order to prevent a serious health risk” to the woman.
The Human Life Protection Act is a type of law that forbids most abortions in states, with the exception of situations where the health of the woman is in grave danger. In essence, this shows that abortions are not permitted and may result in criminal charges if they occur. Additionally, this law is meant to safeguard the rights and interests of the unborn child so that both the mother and the father of the unborn child will receive equal justice, and even the society as a whole will be forewarned of potential consequences.
AJ Plus states:
Hundreds of women protested the end of federal abortion rights outside the U.S. Supreme Court.
- According to the aforementioned statements, hundreds of women gathered outside the US Supreme Court to demonstrate because they were worried about the potential end of Federal abortion drives. They may also have done so in response to legal challenges or changes in laws that could restrict or outlaw access to abortion services throughout the US.
- The protest may be advocating for the protection of women’s reproductive systems, women’s Liberty rights, and the right to decide whether to continue with abortion or not and this will reflect the ongoing national debate over abortion rights as well as the ongoing efforts made by some politicians and network advocacy groups to limit and eliminate access to the abortion services for them all.
Therefore, this statement will be accurate in the future, which also means that the Supreme Court will have overruled the seminal decisions from 1973 that established a constitutional right to an abortion. As a result of these decisions, it would be up to the individual states and territories to regulate abortions, which would give each state and territory more control over their own abortion laws and regulations.
Reference to the 1973 constitutional law: https://www.britannica.com/event/Roe-v-Wade
Thirteen states have “trigger laws” that will ban most or all abortions within a month. At least 26 states are expected to restrict abortion access following the ruling.
More than 26 states are expected to pass new laws and policies that would further sensor access to abortion services for loving such rulings and conditions in addition to the fact that these laws in policies couldn’t be repealed, as some States have different types of laws, some of which are known as trigger laws that would automatically band most all of the abortion within a month of
What will US abortion sanctuary networks look like?
The term “abortion sanctuary network” refers to a recent initiative to develop a local or regionally focused support network for those seeking abortion treatment, particularly in places where access to abortion care is banned or restricted.
The main goal of this is to provide a secure and comforting atmosphere, including resources like transportation, lodging, financial support, and other services, for those who seek abortion treatment. In order to defend reproductive rights and guarantee access to abortion treatment, this network will involve collaborations between local institutions and organizations like health care providers and those who tend to or are obliged to do so.
This networking setup is quite particular and dependent on neighbourhood resources and needs. Some are official agreements, while others take the form of partnerships between municipal or hospital providers. Then, the person can access the need here regardless of the legal, political, or social context surrounding access to abortion.
However, this network is still in its early stages of growth, and it stands as a significant opposition to ongoing efforts to limit access to abortion treatment throughout the United States. This enables people and groups to take action, promote reproductive rights, and guarantee that everyone will have equal access to safe, compassionate and reasonably priced abortion care.
The Department of Health and Human Services in the United States has issued a new rule requiring physicians and other healthcare professionals to provide abortions in urgent medical situations as well as of any state laws or regulations that might forbid or restrict abortion, according to the aforementioned statement. As a result of this new rule, the Office for Civil Rights’ healthcare providers will be required to accept federal money for patients who need emergency abortion care because their lives are in danger. This rule applied to all healthcare and hospital providers who received federal financing, including hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare facilities, where the procedure could result in significant harm that will be and reconsider state one particular event live.
This is specifically used to save the life of one pregnant woman and to protect her from emergency situations that could save not only the woman’s life but also the unborn child’s life, as well as her health issues, and she will also have the right to access abortion care in any emergency situation at any cost. Advocates for productive agriculture and healthcare access, which is more like facing legal challenges, have praised the rule.
What’s happening in the states? Here’s the latest on which abortion laws are in effect and which are blocked.
01. Texas banned the 1925-based law for abortion. It suggests that court significant decisions have important implications for abortion access states.
02. In Florida, the state court was suspended which would ban the abortion after 25 weeks of pregnancy. The violated privacy rules protection in the Florida constitution which guarantees the right to privacy and bodily autonomy. This is especially established for reproductive rights and freedom of a woman.
Freedom to Choose
Access to safe and legal abortion and to quality post-abortion care, especially in cases of complications resulting from unsafe abortions, helps to reduce maternal mortality rates, prevent adolescent and unwanted pregnancies and ensure women’s right to freely decide over their bodies.
Freedom is one of the base terminologies that each and every individual has regardless of race and colour. The UDHR document was published on the 10th of December in Paris to highlight the freedom of one own individual. Likewise, the essence of the status of the topic illuminates that one will be able to abort the unborn child under medical advice if it is harmful to her life.
Abortion still criminalized
“It’s vital that abortion is safe in medical terms” – Dr. Bela Ganatra, Head of WHO’s Prevention of Unsafe Abortion Unit.
Abortion is a right of human. Humans, especially women have the their legitimate to abort a child. This is not a conflict but yet to be understood is that, the mentality of women. Suppose the mother who is not in a proper mental condition either one life would be saved if not neither!
Abortion is not done with the intention of terminating the growth of babies that will be formed in the womb, but to be mentioned the fact is that, the women should be in a proper state where all women are in a proper condition.
Moving on, in abortion criteria, we are rejecting illegal abortion. It means that it is the termination of pregnancy, lack of environment and natural skills, facing lack of medical principles etc.
Yet the child is rising and in the process, as a mother aborting without a reason is prejudice which creates deliberate killing of a blameless child.
How would you consider abortion in your view?